Sponsored Links

Minggu, 13 Mei 2018

Sponsored Links

Home Page | Globant
src: www.globant.com


Video Template talk:Fb cl footer



Rules for classification

In some leagues, the rules for classification are different from the two given options (hth=yes and hth=blank/no)

An example is the Jupiler League 2007-08, where classification is first based on number of points, then number of matches won. If still tied, a playoff is organised.

So the automatically added text Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd goals scored, should be optional. However in most leagues this is indeed the case, so it should probably be the default option. Maybe the easiest is to add the option hth=other and other="<insert rules here>"? --Pelotastalk 23:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Problem fixed. Added a parameter p&mw (points and matches won). Yes = show that rule; blank = don't show.--ClaudioMB (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Great! thanks --Pelotastalk 16:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Maps Template talk:Fb cl footer



Play-offs

There needs to be a new parameter added for Relegation through play-off as well as promotion through play-off. Also should the letters like (R) for relegated be removed once the league has ended? as it becomes obvious which teams are relegated although not which teams are promoted or relegated through play-offs.

There is (O) for promotion through play-offs. I don't know any relegated through play-offs, could you show one as example? Thanks. --ClaudioMB (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
In the Scottish divisions for example the First Division a team can be relegated through a play-off, you did not answer my question as to whether the (R) or (C) letters should stay after the end of the season. Darryl.matheson (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I believe, because of playoffs, the letters should stay in order to make clear which teams went up or down. I've changed the template to show (P) for promoted and removed (O). (P) and (R) should be used for any case of promotion or relegation, because it doesn't matter how a team was promoted or relegated. If it was directly or by playoff, the column Qualification or relegation explain it.--ClaudioMB (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)



New parameter

I've tried adding a new parameter earlier today and, apparently, didn't do it right. The {{#if:|{{{orfc}}} keeps showing in the footer. Can someone who understands the thing fix the problem? Cheers! BanRay 11:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

It's fixed. Just missing closing brackets }} for {{#if:{{{wins|}}}|.--ClaudioMB (talk) 13:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks BanRay 14:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)



Updated...

"Updated to games played on" needs to be changed in the footer because it only makes sense if you update a current season's table. But that is not always the case.

Let me give you a few examples where it would not make sense:

  1. Updating a previous season's table because of an error (or something like that).
  2. Creating a past season's article using these templates.
  3. Updating a season's article days after the last match.

In those cases, the date of update is not going to be the date of the previous game played in that season; it's going to be whatever day the update was made. The date of update needs to be whatever day the update was made, not what day the last match(es) was played on. Having "Updated to games played on" makes us have to use the date of the last match, but "Last updated on" allows for whatever date an update was made to be put. Digirami (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The date is used as a guide so that the next editor knows which games are included in the classification. Once the season is over, there is no need for a date. So if you are creating, revising, or correcting an older year, you can leave the date out by removing the "U" parameter.AntropovNikki (talk) 16:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
If that is the case and it intended usage, someone should update the template documentation in order to avoid confusion from other possible users (the way it is now is wrong, apparently). Digirami (talk) 22:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)



Customize footer

Now all one letter abbreviation are automatically entered in the bottom, example:

Source:
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored
(C) = Champion; (R) = Relegated; (P) = Promoted; (E) = Eliminated; (O) = Play-off winner; (A) = Advances to a further round.
Only applicable when the season is not finished:
(Q) = Qualified to the phase of tournament indicated; (TQ) = Qualified to tournament, but not yet to the particular phase indicated; (RQ) = Qualified to the relegation tournament indicated; (DQ) = Disqualified from tournament. These 9 options are not always used in the table, maybe it would be useful to add an option that only a user defined list is used. Or, alternatively, that the bottom two lines can be turned off when the season is over. CRwikiCA talk 16:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I made the change in the sandbox with adding a parameter, default:

Source:
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) = Champion; (R) = Relegated; (P) = Promoted; (E) = Eliminated; (O) = Play-off winner; (A) = Advances to a further round.
Only applicable when the season is not finished:
(Q) = Qualified to the phase of tournament indicated; (TQ) = Qualified to tournament, but not yet to the particular phase indicated; (DQ) = Disqualified from tournament.

When season is over

Source:
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) = Champion; (R) = Relegated; (P) = Promoted; (E) = Eliminated; (O) = Play-off winner; (A) = Advances to a further round.

If there are no objections I will change this in the live template soon. CRwikiCA talk 01:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
I will now incorporate the change. CRwikiCA talk 21:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)



citation needed

A citation is needed for each division/league so needs to have an input to the template. achangeisasgoodasa (talk) 00:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean? CRwikiCA talk 01:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Apologies, I read the code wrong! Ignore achangeisasgoodasa (talk) 12:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I crossed out the text. Cheers. CRwikiCA talk 13:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Source of the article : Wikipedia

Comments
0 Comments